fast file site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. 다시보기 Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.
You should share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect to other Google services such as Gmail.
Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...
You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).
It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.